Assertion, Denial and Non-classical Theories
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper I urge friends of truth-value gaps and truth-value gluts – proponents of paracomplete and paraconsistent logics – to consider theories not merely as sets of sentences, but as pairs of sets of sentences, or what I call ‘bitheories,’ which keep track not only of what holds according to the theory, but also what fails to hold according to the theory. I explain the connection between bitheories, sequents, and the speech acts of assertion and denial. I illustrate the usefulness of bitheories by showing how they make available a technique for characterising different theories while abstracting away from logical vocabulary such as connectives or quantifiers, thereby making theoretical commitments independent of the choice of this or that particular non-classical logic. Examples discussed include theories of numbers, classes and truth. In the latter two cases, the bitheoretical perspective brings to light some heretofore unconsidered puzzles for friends of naïve theories of classes and truth. 1 assertion, denial & sequents Friends of truth-value gaps and truth-value gluts both must distinguish the assertion of a negation (asserting p¬pq) and denial (denying ppq). If you take there to be a truth-value glut at ppq the appropriate claim to make (when asked) is to assert p¬pq without thereby denying ppq. If you take there to be a truthvalue gap at ppq the appropriate claim to make (when asked) is to deny ppq without thereby asserting p¬pq. Comments from readers on this paper are very welcome. Please check the webpage http: //consequently.org/writing/adnct for the latest version of the paper, to post comments and to read comments left by others. { Thanks to the Logic Seminar at the University of Melbourne and the audience at wcp4 (including Jc Beall, Patrick Girard and Jerry Seligman), and to Michael De, for comments on this material, and to an anonymous referee, who helpfully pressed on certain points, and asked me to write up the little proof (in footnote 22) that there are at most two truth values. { This research is supported by the Australian Research Council, through grant dp0343388, and Max Richter’s 24 Postcards in Full Colour.
منابع مشابه
On the Strict Tolerant Conception of Truth
We discuss four distinct semantic consequence relations which are based on Strong Kleene theories of truth and which generalize the notion of classical consequence to 3-valued logics. Then we set up a uniform signed tableau calculus (the strict-tolerant calculus) which we show to be sound and complete with respect to each of the four semantic consequence relations. The signs employed by our cal...
متن کاملSome Comments on Ian Rumfitt's Bilateralism
Ian Rumfitt has proposed systems of bilateral logic for primitive speech acts of assertion and denial, with the purpose of ‘exploring the possibility of specifying the classically intended senses for the connectives in terms of their deductive use’ (Rumfitt (2000): 810f). Rumfitt formalises two systems of bilateral logic and gives two arguments for their classical nature. I assess both argument...
متن کاملStudy of Volumetric Flow Rate of a Micropump Using a Non-classical Elasticity Theory
The purpose of this research is to study the mechanical behavior of a micropump with clamped circular diaphragm which is the main component of drug delivery systems. In this paper, the non-linear governing equations of the circular microplate using Kirchhoff thin plate theory was been extracted based on the modified couple stress (MCST) and classical (CT) theories. Then, the non-linear equation...
متن کاملNegation, Denial, and Rejection
At least since Frege (1960) and Geach (1965), there has been some consensus about the relation between negation, the speech act of denial, and the attitude of rejection: a denial, the consensus has had it, is the assertion of a negation, and a rejection is a belief in a negation. Recently, though, there have been notable deviations from this orthodox view. Rejectivists have maintained that nega...
متن کاملDefinitional Reasoning in Proof-Theoretic Semantics and the Square of Opposition
Within a framework of reasoning with respect to clausal definitions of atoms, four forms of judgement are distinguished: Direct and indirect assertion, and direct and indirect denial. Whereas direct assertion and direct denial are established by directly applying a definitional clause (“definitional closure”), indirect assertion and indirect denial result from showing that all possible premisse...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013